(23-05-12) Low Carb Beats Low Fat for Fat Loss & More
A study that Johns Hopkins researchers presented at a recent American Heart
Association meeting showed the more belly fat you lose, the better your
arteries can expand, which allows more blood to flow to your heart, brain, and
other areas.
The six-month study divided 60 men and women into two groups that combined
either a low-fat or low-carb diet with moderate exercise. Both groups ate the
same number of calories.
Researchers used a blood flow test to evaluate participants? vascular health.
They measured how much blood reached their fingertips before, during, and after
a blood pressure cuff restricted arterial flow.
Measuring blood flow to your fingertips, by the way, provides an indication
about your overall vascular health.
The more belly fat these people lost, the more blood flowed to their
fingertips, indicating better arterial function.
?Our study demonstrated that the amount of improvement in the vessels was
directly linked to how much central, or belly fat, the individuals lost,
regardless of which diet they were on,? said lead researcher and John Hopkins
professor Kerry J. Stewart.
?This is important since there have been concerns that a low-carb diet, which
means eating more fat, may have a harmful effect on cardiovascular health.
These results showed no harmful effects from the low-carb diet.?
If you?ve seen firsthand how powerfully a low-carb diet helps burn fat and
boost health, you?re thrilled with these kinds of studies. Finally, researchers
admit a low-carb diet trumps low-fat diets for fat loss as well as vascular
(and other) health measures.
Better late than never.
But the news gets even better: participants on a low-carb diet in this study
lost an average of 10 pounds more than those on a low-fat diet.
?After six months, those who were on the low-carb diet lost an average of 28.9
pounds versus 18.7 pounds among those on the low-fat diet,? Kerry said.
If you follow these studies, you know researchers allow a wide margin for what
they consider a low-carb diet. Some studies severely limit carb intake to
Atkins Induction levels (20 grams or less). Others are a little more, shall we
say, lenient.
This was one of the more lenient studies.
Researchers here restricted carbs to 30% of the low-carb group?s diet, coming
from foods like bread, pasta, and fruit.
Which, as you know, isn?t exactly low carb.
I wonder what would have happened if researchers put these participants an
even more restricted low-carb diet that focused on lean protein, good fats,
leafy green vegetables, nuts and seeds, and berries.
In other words, the same kind of diet our Paleo ancestors thrived on, and the
one I think we?re most adapted to today.
I?m betting that their fat loss and vascular health would have improved even
more.
That?s what I find so impressive. Even though the low-carb group devoured up
to 30% of their carbs as bread and pasta, they still lost an average of 10 more
pounds than the low-fat group.
Even reducing your carbs a little bit can provide health benefits and fat
loss.
But why do it halfway? After all, eating a low-carb (say, around 50 grams a
day), moderate-protein, higher-fat whole foods diet allows you to eat the most
nutrient-rich, satisfying, fat-burning foods on the planet.
Check out my new low-carb weight loss program Unleash Your Thin if you want
more details.
Source: johnnybowden.com
News
In evidenza
"L'informazione presente nel sito serve a migliorare, e non a sostituire, il rapporto medico-paziente."
Per coloro che hanno problemi di salute si consiglia di consultare sempre il proprio medico curante.
Informazioni utili
-
Ricette a zona
-
Tabelle nutrizionali
-
Tabella composizione corporea
-
ABC della nutrizione