(21-01-13) Shock study: Mammograms a medical hoax, over one million American women maimed by unnecessary 'treatment' for cancer...

Shock study: Mammograms a medical hoax, over one million American women maimed by unnecessary 'treatment' for cancer they never had

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

(NaturalNews) Mammography is a cruel medical hoax. As I have described here on
Natural News many times, the primary purpose of mammography is not to "save"
women from cancer, but to recruit women into false positives that scare them
into expensive, toxic treatments like chemotherapy, radiation and surgery.

The "dirty little secret" of the cancer industry is that the very same
oncologists who scare women into falsely believing they have breast cancer are
also the ones pocketing huge profits from selling those women chemotherapy
drugs. The conflicts of interest and abandonment of ethics across the cancer
industry is breathtaking.

Now, a new scientific study has confirmed exactly what I've been warning
readers about for years: most women "diagnosed" with breast cancer via
mammography never had a cancer problem to begin with!

93% of "early detection" has no benefit to the patient
That's the conclusion of a groundbreaking new study published in the New
England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).

"We found that the introduction of screening has been associated with about
1.5 million additional women receiving a diagnosis of early stage breast
cancer," writes study co-author Dr. Gilbert Welch.

Now, at first, you might think that's a good thing. You might think, "Well,
early detection saves lives, just like we've been told by Komen and the cancer
non-profits."

But you'd be wrong. As Dr. Welch's team discovered, there was virtually no
reduction in late-stage breast cancer from all this "early" diagnosis, meaning
that most women who were told they had breast cancer after a mammogram were
being lied to.

As he explains:

We found that there were only around 0.1 million fewer women with a diagnosis
of late-stage breast cancer. This discrepancy means there was a lot of
overdiagnosis: more than a million women who were told they had early stage
cancer -- most of whom underwent surgery, chemotherapy or radiation -- for a
"cancer" that was never going to make them sick. Although it's impossible to
know which women these are, that's some pretty serious harm.

Yep, it is. In fact, if you do the math and calculate 0.1 million fewer women
with advanced-stage cancer out of 1.5 million who were diagnosed, 93% of the
"early detection" cancer cases studied were false positives, meaning that they
would never have gone on to cause advanced-stage cancer anyway.

Chemo, radiation, cancer surgery largely a hoax
According to these scientists, "Breast cancer was overdiagnosed (i.e., tumors
were detected on screening that would never have led to clinical symptoms) in
1.3 million U.S. women in the past 30 years."

That's 1.3 million women who were told by their lying oncologists: "If you
don't agree to treatment, you'll be dead in six months" (or two years, or
whatever fraudulent scare schedule they use).

Under the threat of this fear, most women cave in and agree to start
"treatment" -- often on the very same day they are falsely diagnosed. This so-
called "treatment" consists of a highly toxic injection of deadly chemicals
that the oncologist makes a small fortune selling to the very same patients he
falsely diagnosed. Yep, that's right: Cancer clinics and oncology treatment
centers make huge profits on the chemotherapy drugs they sell to patients --
the very same patients they scared into treatment through a false positive
mammogram.

Despite the near-total failure of mammography from a scientific point of view,
the propaganda push for mammography is downright deafening. As Dr. Welch
explains in his New York Times article:

...No other medical test has been as aggressively promoted as mammograms --
efforts that have gone beyond persuasion to guilt and even coercion ("I can't
be your doctor if you don't get one"). And proponents have used the most
misleading screening statistic there is: survival rates. A recent Komen
foundation campaign typifies the approach: In short, tell everyone they have
cancer, and survival will [statistically] skyrocket.

Komen for the Cure, of course, has been caught blatantly lying about the
supposed "benefits" of mammography. Their statistical deception fools most
women, sadly, convincing them to undergo toxic chemotherapy for a "breast
cancer" they never really had.

The quackery of modern oncology
Once women begin the chemotherapy for a cancer they don't even have, they
begin to experience what the quack oncologist calls "symptoms of cancer." Their
hair falls out. They lose their appetite. Their muscles atrophy. They become
weak, mentally confused and chronically fatigued. The cancer doctor then tells
the woman, "You must be strong to pull through this while the medicine is
working."

Pure quackery! You could do much better invoking voodoo or even just wishing
to be cured. Because everything about the cancer experience in modern medicine
-- the diagnosis, the "treatment," the medical authority -- is utterly and
maliciously fabricated for the purpose of generating cancer industry profits.

"Better" technology leads to more false positives
There is no more apparent example of modern-day medical quackery than the
cancer industry. Armed with ever-more-precise mammography machines, the rate of
false positive diagnoses has shot through the roof.

As Dr. Welch writes in the New York Times:

Six years ago, a long-term follow-up of a randomized trial showed that about
one-quarter of cancers detected by screening were overdiagnosed. And this study
reflected mammograms as used in the 1980s. Newer digital mammograms detect a
lot more abnormalities, and the estimates of overdiagnosis have risen
commensurately: now somewhere between a third and half of screen-detected
cancers.

Got that? Many cancer diagnoses from mammography are utterly false. But they
are a great scare tactic for recruiting women into what can only be called a
"cult of cancer" in which they are manipulated into poisoning themselves with
chemicals. They are later called "cancer survivors" if the poison doesn't
manage to kill them.

These cancer survivors are, of course, victims of a malicious medical cult
that I call "the Cult of Komen." In nearly all cases, it wasn't the cancer that
nearly killed them... it was the treatment!

The cult of Komen
Modern day people sneer and snort at the Jim Jones mass suicide cult of 1978,
thinking, "How could those cult members be so stupid to poison themselves to
death?"

Look around, folks, because the cancer industry has taken the Jim Jones
formula and multiplied it by a factor of a million. The "Cult of Komen" is the
modern-day Jim Jones "suicide cult." It's a cult where people "believe" in the
promise of salvation through chemical indoctrination, but what's actually
delivered to them is rotting death, pain, suffering and humiliation. (Many
cancer surgeons operating today literally slice off women's breasts following a
false positive cancer diagnosis, maiming her for life.)

One of the earmarks of this cult is the worship of self-mutilation. It's not
just the women who are manipulated into having their breasts sliced off by
surgeons; it's also the women who are manipulated into being injected with
deadly poisons that destroy their kidneys, livers and brains. The No. 1 side
effect of chemotherapy, by the way, is cancer.

Like any cult, the cancer industry cult pushes its delusions with emotionally-
charged propaganda and powerful symbols (pink ribbons). Millions of women get
innocently swept up into the "run for the cure," apparently clueless to the
fact that most of that "cure" money goes to pay for more mammograms that result
in more false diagnoses which ensnare yet more women into the same
victimization racket.

Thus, the very women who participate in raising money for these pink ribbon
cult worship-fests are actually paying for the mammogram machines that will
recruit more women into the same cult via a quack diagnosis followed by a
"campaign of fear and terror" carried out by oncologists against women. What
the cancer industry is doing today is, by any measure, a crime against women.
It's also a form of cultural mutilation of women, much like we've seen in
Aztec, Mayan and various African cultures throughout history.

Is the Cult of Komen a criminal operation? Almost certainly. Is it scientific?
Not a chance. There is nothing "scientific" about the modern-day cancer
industry other than the scientific manipulation of women's fears and emotions.
What Komen and the cancer industry lacks in ethics, science or facts, it more
than makes up for in tactics of linguistic influence, arm-twisting and flat-out
lying to the public about the over-hyped benefits of mammography.

The cancer industry isn't in the business of curing cancer, after all. But it
is in the business of catapulting the propaganda of the delusional cancer cult.
As Dr. Welch explains:

Screening proponents have also encouraged the public to believe two things
that are patently untrue. First, that every woman who has a cancer diagnosed by
mammography has had her life saved (consider those "Mammograms save lives. I'm
the proof" T-shirts for breast cancer survivors). The truth is, those survivors
are much more likely to have been victims of overdiagnosis.

Thus, all those women marching around with pink T-shirts that say, "Mammograms
save lives" are actually declaring themselves to be the unwitting victims of a
scientific campaign of targeting women, scaring women into treatment they don't
need, then maiming women with toxic chemicals or surgeons' knives.

If those pink T-shirts actually told the truth, they should say, "I survived
the cancer industry."

The big question in all this, of course, is: For how long will western
civilization continue to live under the spell of the Cult of Komen? How many
million women have yet to be sacrificed to the false quackery of mammography
and the scam of modern oncology?

And more importantly, why do families allows their own mothers, daughters,
aunts and grandmothers to be poisoned and maimed right in front of their own
eyes, while they all sit back and submit to the false authority of profit-
seeking doctors who practice nothing more than pure quackery?

Modern oncology represents the Dark Ages of western medicine
There will come a day, I have repeatedly predicted, when the modern practice
of chemotherapy will be relegated to the history books of bad medicine,
alongside sniffing mercury vapors and surgically removing body organs to treat
mental disorders.

Until that day comes, countless numbers of innocent women will be tricked into
being mutilated, chemically poisoned, and blasted with ionizing radiation by
cruel doctors who frankly don't care one bit how many women they maim or murder
as long as they get reimbursed by Medicare for the procedures.

That's the truth about the cancer industry you won't hear from Komen (nor from
any of its pink ribbon cult followers).

The conclusion from the study authors
Despite substantial increases in the number of cases of early-stage breast
cancer detected, screening mammography has only marginally reduced the rate at
which women present with advanced cancer. Although it is not certain which
women have been affected, the imbalance suggests that there is substantial
overdiagnosis, accounting for nearly a third of all newly diagnosed breast
cancers, and that screening is having, at best, only a small effect on the rate
of death from breast cancer.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1206809?query=featured_hom...

News

---

In evidenza

"L'informazione presente nel sito serve a migliorare, e non a sostituire, il rapporto medico-paziente."

Per coloro che hanno problemi di salute si consiglia di consultare sempre il proprio medico curante.